Apple's Apps policies

I have just found a note on Apple's policy for Apps developers who made Apple's iPhone the huge success it has become. Looks like Apple is another "19th-century gamekeeper":

Section 7.2 makes it clear that any applications developed using Apple's SDK may only be publicly distributed through the App Store, and that Apple can reject an app for any reason, even if it meets all the formal requirements disclosed by Apple. So if you use the SDK and your app is rejected by Apple, you're prohibited from distributing it through competing app stores like Cydia or Rock Your Phone.

Furthermore:

Section 10.4 prohibits developers, including government agencies such as NASA, from making any "public statements" about the terms of the Agreement. This is particularly strange, since the Agreement itself is not "Apple Confidential Information" as defined in Section 10.1. So the terms are not confidential, but developers are contractually forbidden from speaking "publicly" about them.

Besides the developers, I am also wondering about the possible impact on Apps users:

Section 8 makes it clear that Apple can "revoke the digital certificate of any of Your Applications at any time." Steve Jobs has confirmed that Apple can remotely disable apps, even after they have been installed by users. This contract provision would appear to allow that.

Imagine what would happen if you use an App that is key to running your business and Apple decided to terminate it. I think the Grigorieff lab should also have such a policy. This way we can easily disable our competitors if they use our software!