ctffind 4.1.13
Forums
I have installed ctffind 4.1.13 from ctffind-4.1.13.tar.gz based on inside “REDME” and the message from “Error compiling version 4.1.13 on Linux –using pdb.h & water.h files” in the Forum. However, when I run relion 3.1 for the CTF estimation it gave run.err as attached (which I have converted to the doc format with the content exactly copied and pasted from run.err).
In order for you to know whether the input corrected-micrographs.star was correctly got from the MotionCorrection step, here I also attached my corrected corrected-micrographs.star file (which I have converted to the doc format with the content exactly copied and pasted from corrected-micrographs.star) .
I am lookinf forward to getting your help to make the ctffind workable for my installation of relion 3.1.
Best regards.
Sincerely yours,
Smith
Hello Smith, Sorry that you…
Hello Smith,
Sorry that you are encountering a segmentation fault when running ctffind. This is usually the result of a bug in the program.
The first thing I would ask is for you to run the latest version of ctffind, 4.1.14, which I just uploaded to the ctffind download page. This has a couple of a bug fixes relative to 4.1.13.
If possible, please just run a pre-compiled binary that you can download from that page. The ctffind-4.1.14.tar.gz archive contains the source, which you have to compile yourself, but the other .tar.gz files, for example ctffind-4.1.14-linux64.tar.gz contain pre-compiled binaries.
Also, for testing purposes, please do not run ctffind via the RELION interface, as this just complicates things. Instead, just execute the "ctffind" binary directly in your terminal and answer the questions at the terminal, providing the input image or movie, the pixel size, etc.
If, when you have done all this, you still get a segmentation fault, then please re-run the exact same thing but using the pre-compiled binary that includes debug information (the file you download has the suffix -dbg.tar.gz). This may printout a more informative error message.
Good luck, and thanks for trying ctffind!
Cheers,
Alexis
ctffind-4.1.14
In reply to Hello Smith, Sorry that you… by Alexis
Dear Alexis,
I have installed the ctffind-4.1.14 from ctffind-4.1.14-linux64.tar.gz, and the message given was as following (between “___-“):
_________
Input image file name [ln-mrc.mrc] : /root/MotionCorr/job019/relionrelated/tutorialdata/relion30_tutorial/Movies/20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc
Output diagnostic image file name [aaaaa.mrc] : abc1.mrc
Pixel size [0.885] : 0.885
Acceleration voltage [300] : 200
Spherical aberration [1.4] : 1.4
Amplitude contrast [0.1] : 0.1
Size of amplitude spectrum to compute [256] : 512
Minimum resolution [30] : 30
Maximum resolution [5] : 5
Minimum defocus [5000] : 5000
Maximum defocus [50000] : 50000
Defocus search step [10] : 100
Do you know what astigmatism is present? [no] : no
Slower, more exhaustive search? [yes] : no
Use a restraint on astigmatism? [yes] : no
Find additional phase shift? [no] : no
Do you want to set expert options? [yes] : no
File name: 20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc
File type: MRC
Dimensions: X = 3710 Y = 3838 Z = 1
Number of slices: 1
Working on micrograph 1 of 1
OpenMP is not available - will not use parallel threads.
AverageRank is NaN for bin 2011
Failed Assert at ../src/programs/ctffind/ctffind.cpp:2825
bool ComputeRotationalAverageOfPowerSpectrum(Image*, CTF*, Image*, Image*, int, double*, double*, double*, double*, float*, float*)
Aborted (core dumped)
______
Then I installed ctffind-4.1.14 from ctffind-4.1.14-linux64.compat-dbg-tar.gz (I guess with this installation it will automatically replace the ctffind I installed from ctffind-4.1.14-linux64.tar.gz, am I right?), I have processed 2 runnings with the debug installation. The first time message was as following:
_____
Input image file name
[/root/MotionCorr/job019/relionrelated/tutorialdata/relion30_tutorial/Movies/20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc] : /root/MotionCorr/job019/relionrelated/tutorialdata/relion30_tutorial/Movies/20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc
Output diagnostic image file name [fan7.mrc] :abc2.mrc
Pixel size [0.885] : 0.885
Acceleration voltage [200] : 200
Spherical aberration [1.4] : 1.4
Amplitude contrast [0.1] : 0.1
Size of amplitude spectrum to compute [512] : 512
Minimum resolution [50] : 30
Maximum resolution [0] : 5
Minimum defocus [0] : 5000
Maximum defocus [500000] : 50000
Defocus search step [10] : 100
Do you know what astigmatism is present? [no] : no
Slower, more exhaustive search? [no] : no
Use a restraint on astigmatism? [no] : no
Find additional phase shift? [no] : no
Do you want to set expert options? [no] : no
File name: 20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc
File type: MRC
Dimensions: X = 3710 Y = 3838 Z = 1
Number of slices: 1
Working on micrograph 1 of 1
OpenMP is not available - will not use parallel threads.
Average is NaN for bin 904
Failed Assert at ../src/programs/ctffind/ctffind.cpp:2824
bool ComputeRotationalAverageOfPowerSpectrum(Image*, CTF*, Image*, Image*, int, double*, double*, double*, double*, float*, float*)
Aborted (core dumped)
_____
The second time message with the new debug was as following:
____
Input image file name
[/root/MotionCorr/job019/relionrelated/tutorialdata/relion30_tutorial/Movies/20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc] : /root/MotionCorr/job019/relionrelated/tutorialdata/relion30_tutorial/Movies/20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc
Output diagnostic image file name [fan6.mrc] :abc3.mrc
Pixel size [0.885] : 0.885
Acceleration voltage [200] : 200
Spherical aberration [1.4] : 1.4
Amplitude contrast [0.1] : 0.1
Size of amplitude spectrum to compute [512] : 512
Minimum resolution [0] : 100
Error: Number outside of acceptable range!
Minimum resolution [0] : 60
Error: Number outside of acceptable range!
Minimum resolution [0] : 50
Maximum resolution [0] : 0
Minimum defocus [5000] : 0
Maximum defocus [50000] : 500000
Defocus search step [100] : 10
Do you know what astigmatism is present? [yes] : no
Slower, more exhaustive search? [no] : no
Use a restraint on astigmatism? [no] : no
Find additional phase shift? [no] : no
Do you want to set expert options? [no] : no
File name: 20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc
File type: MRC
Dimensions: X = 3710 Y = 3838 Z = 1
Number of slices: 1
Working on micrograph 1 of 1
OpenMP is not available - will not use parallel threads.
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
___
I m looking forward to getting your message on whether I have processed wrongly with ctffind, or there is still bug in the new version of ctffind.
Best regards.
Sincerely yours,
Smith
This looks like a bug. Could…
In reply to ctffind-4.1.14 by Smith_Lee
This looks like a bug. Could you please share the input file 20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc with me so I can investigate further?
Movies/20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc
In reply to ctffind-4.1.14 by Smith_Lee
Dear Alexis,
Movies/20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc has been added to the attachments of this topic in the Forum.
Best regards
Smith
ctffind 4.13 & 4.14
In reply to Movies/20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc by Smith_Lee
Dear Alexis,
With the 20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc I attached, have you fixed the bug related to the cttfind 4.14, or the error message was caused by some other reason?
I am looking forward to getting a reply from you.
Smith
Hi Smith, Thanks for…
In reply to ctffind 4.13 & 4.14 by Smith_Lee
Hi Smith,
Thanks for uploading the image, and for the reminder.
Unfortunately, I am not able to reproduce the problem:
Can you confirm that you are definitely running ctffind 4.1.14 (it prints the version number to the terminal when you start the program)? Also, maybe could you confirm that the same binary works OK with other input files?
Cheers,
Alexis
Segment fault for ctffind 4.1.14
In reply to Hi Smith, Thanks for… by Alexis
Dear Alexis,
Based on your advice, I have installed ctffind 4.1.14 from ctffind-4.1.14-linux64.tar.gz and ctffind-4.1.14-linux64-compat-dbg.tar.gz, both show Segment fault (core dumped), before input any mrc file.
Then I reinstalled ctffind 4.1.14 from ctffind-4.1.14.tar.gz, to gurantee it is ctffind 4.1.14 works. Based on your suggestion, I run 2 differenct mrc files.
The first mrc result is:
[root@localhost Movies]# /usr/local/bin/bin/ctffind
** Welcome to Ctffind **
Version : 4.1.14
Compiled : May 13 2020
Mode : Interactive
Input image file name [input.mrc] : 20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc
Output diagnostic image file name
[diagnostic_output.mrc] : abcoutput.mrc
Pixel size [1.0] : 0.885
Acceleration voltage [300.0] : 200
Spherical aberration [2.70] : 1.4
Amplitude contrast [0.07] : 0.1
Size of amplitude spectrum to compute [512] : 512
Minimum resolution [30.0] : 30
Maximum resolution [5.0] : 5
Minimum defocus [5000.0] : 5000
Maximum defocus [50000.0] : 50000
Defocus search step [100.0] : 100
Do you know what astigmatism is present? [no] : no
Slower, more exhaustive search? [no] : no
Use a restraint on astigmatism? [no] : no
Find additional phase shift? [no] : no
Do you want to set expert options? [no] : no
File name: 20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc
File type: MRC
Dimensions: X = 3710 Y = 3838 Z = 1
Number of slices: 1
Working on micrograph 1 of 1
OpenMP is not available - will not use parallel threads.
DFMID1 DFMID2 ANGAST CC
13000.02 13000.02 -42.50 0.14053
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
The second mrc result is:
[root@localhost Movies]# /usr/local/bin/bin/ctffind
** Welcome to Ctffind **
Version : 4.1.14
Compiled : May 13 2020
Mode : Interactive
Input image file name
[20170629_00049_frameImage.mrc] : 20170629_00048_frameImage.mrc
Output diagnostic image file name [abcoutput.mrc] : fanfanabc.mrc
Pixel size [0.885] : 0.885
Acceleration voltage [200] : 200
Spherical aberration [1.4] : 1.4
Amplitude contrast [0.1] : 0.1
Size of amplitude spectrum to compute [512] : 512
Minimum resolution [30] : 30
Maximum resolution [5] : 5
Minimum defocus [5000] : 5000
Maximum defocus [50000] : 50000
Defocus search step [100] : 100
Do you know what astigmatism is present? [no] : no
Slower, more exhaustive search? [no] : no
Use a restraint on astigmatism? [no] : no
Find additional phase shift? [no] : no
Do you want to set expert options? [no] : no
File name: 20170629_00048_frameImage.mrc
File type: MRC
Dimensions: X = 3710 Y = 3838 Z = 1
Number of slices: 1
Working on micrograph 1 of 1
OpenMP is not available - will not use parallel threads.
DFMID1 DFMID2 ANGAST CC
12100.02 12100.02 -12.50 0.17350
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
After the failure of crffind 4.1.13 and 4.1.14, I then installed ctffind 4.1.10 from ctffind-4.1.10.tar.gz. Surprisingly, ctffind 4.1.10 works for me!
So in my computer it seems it lacks something the ctffind 4.1.13 and 4.1.14 need, which ctffind 4.1.10 has.
I am looking forward to getting your advice on how to make ctffind 4.14 workable in my computer.
If you need further message from me, please feel free to let me know.
Smith
Hello, Sometimes, segfaults…
In reply to Segment fault for ctffind 4.1.14 by Smith_Lee
Hello,
Sometimes, segfaults are due to the program exceeding some memory limit imposed by your operating system (example). There were quite a few changes between 4.1.10 and 4.1.14 which affect how much memory ctffind needs in order to run. My hypothesis is that the computer you are working on right now has a low limit.
Two ways to test this:
1. Either try to find another computer and try again
2. Or learn about the shell program "ulimit" and use it to raise any limits in place on your computer. Just running "ulimit" should tell you what limits are in place. Then you can run it with arguments to change these limits.
Hope this helps
Alexis
Hello Smith, I may have…
In reply to Segment fault for ctffind 4.1.14 by Smith_Lee
Hello Smith,
I may have found a fix. Could you please download, compile and run the version of 4.1.14 available here:
https://grigoriefflab.umassmed.edu/node/6323
And please let me know if this fixes your problem.
Cheers,
Alexis
Hi Alexis,I'm having…
In reply to ctffind-4.1.14 by Smith_Lee
Hi Alexis,
I'm having exactly the same problem with ctffind 4.1.13 (I haven't tried 4.1.14 yet) on Arch Linux. I have no limits for ulimit. I have tried both binaries and compilation from sources, both fail with segfault. I compiled ctffind with debug on and ran it with gdb. I put a breakpoint at line 2820. The problem seems to be here:
The number_of_bins in my case is 363, but the counter on line 2823 continues outside of the loop and keeps going as can be seen below. This is how I get NaNs:
Hi Grigory, Thanks for…
In reply to Hi Alexis,I'm having… by Grigory
Hi Grigory,
Thanks for taking time to investigate this - it does look like a bug. Could you try to reproduce with 4.1.14, and, assuming it reproduces, could you please send the input image and runtime parameters so that I can investigate further? I believe if you start a new forum topic you'll have the option to attach files to the initial post in the topic.
Thanks!
Alexis